Message Boards
implement custom resolvers for Liferay Connector to SAML 2.0 Liferay 7.1
implement custom resolvers for Liferay Connector to SAML 2.0 Liferay 7.1
New Member Posts: 14 Join Date: 9/28/15 Recent PostsHi,
I am having problem implementing custom user resolver in Liferay DXP 7.1 with FP 24. When I deploy the portlet I am getting unsatisfied service reference for UserResolver.
build.gradle
dependencies {
compileOnly group: "com.liferay.portal", name: "com.liferay.portal.kernel", version: "3.0.0"
compileOnly group: "javax.portlet", name: "portlet-api", version: "3.0.0"
compileOnly group: "javax.servlet", name: "javax.servlet-api", version: "3.0.1"
compileOnly group: "org.osgi", name: "org.osgi.service.component.annotations", version: "1.3.0"
compileOnly group: "org.osgi", name: "osgi.core", version: "6.0.0"
compileOnly files('./src/main/resources/libs/com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration-2.0.40.jar')
compileOnly files('./src/main/resources/libs/com.liferay.saml.persistence.api-2.1.12.jar')
compile group: 'struts', name: 'struts', version: '1.2.9'
compile group: 'joda-time', name: 'joda-time', version: '2.2'
compile group: 'org.joda', name: 'joda-convert', version: '1.2'
compileOnly group: 'org.opensaml', name: 'opensaml-messaging-api', version: '3.3.0'
compileOnly group: 'org.opensaml', name: 'opensaml-saml-api', version: '3.3.0'
compile group: 'com.liferay', name: 'com.liferay.osgi.service.tracker.collections', version: '3.1.0'
}
GOGO shell logs for ds:unsatisfied command.
g! ds:unsatisfied
Bundle {id: 1077, name: custom.saml.user.resolver, version: 1.0.0}
Declarative Service {id: 4539, name: custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver, unsatisfied references:
{name: UserResolver, target: (component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.resolver.DefaultUserResolver)}
}
g! scr:list 1077
custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver in bundle 1,077 (custom.saml.user.resolver:1.0.0) enabled, 1 instance.
Id: 4539, State:UNSATISFIED REFERENCE
g! scr:info 4539
Component Description: custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver
===========================================================================
Class: custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver
Bundle: 1077 (custom.saml.user.resolver:1.0.0)
Enabled: true
Immediate: true
Services: [com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.resolver.UserResolver]
Scope: singleton
Config PID(s): [custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver], Policy: optional
Base Props: (3 entries)
MetadataManager.target<String> = (component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.metadata.MetadataManagerImpl)
UserResolver.target<String> = (component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.resolver.DefaultUserResolver)
service.ranking<Integer> = -2147483647Component Configuration Id: 4539
--------------------------------
State: UNSATISFIED REFERENCE
Config Props: (5 entries)
MetadataManager.target<String> = (component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.metadata.MetadataManagerImpl)
UserResolver.target<String> = (component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.resolver.DefaultUserResolver)
component.id<Long> = 4539
component.name<String> = custom.saml.user.resolver.portlet.CustomUserResolver
service.ranking<Integer> = -2147483647
References: (total 3)
- UserResolver: com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.resolver.UserResolver UNSATISFIED 1..1 static
target=(component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.resolver.DefaultUserResolver) scope=bundle
- MetadataManager: com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.metadata.MetadataManager SATISFIED 1..1 static
target=(component.name=com.liferay.saml.opensaml.integration.internal.metadata.MetadataManagerImpl) scope=bundle (no active bindings)
- UserLocalService: com.liferay.portal.kernel.service.UserLocalService SATISFIED 1..1 static
target=(*) scope=bundle (no active bindings)
I am following tutorials from liferay official site, links are below.
And
https://liferay.dev/en/b/customizing-the-liferay-connector-to-saml-2-0-app
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sami