John Arne 16 Years Ago Why don't you just use checkstyle? Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel Minhchau Dang John Arne 16 Years Ago - Edited I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Minhchau Dang John Arne 16 Years Ago - Edited I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Jorge Ferrer 16 Years Ago Hi Minhchau,That's very nice. Could you add it to the wiki article? Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Steffen Schuler 7 Years Ago It is an old article... what is the current state, when it comes to applying style to code? Is there a checkstyle rule file available, these days? Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel