<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Seam Portlet</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=119785294&amp;threadId=1292921" />
  <subtitle>Seam Portlet</subtitle>
  <id>https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=119785294&amp;threadId=1292921</id>
  <updated>2026-04-06T14:04:02Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-06T14:04:02Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Seam Portlet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1543132" />
    <author>
      <name>Alexey Kakunin</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1543132</id>
    <updated>2008-11-05T17:06:51Z</updated>
    <published>2008-11-05T17:06:51Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Same for me - do not like Icefaces, but it looks like for current moment it is not stable way to use Seam under Liferay. Also forgot about RichFaces (and a4j) under Liferay - it is not supported - and really do not know then it will be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After some investigation I found like most stable way to develop JSF portlets for Liferay is (in case you do not like Icefaces) is: JSF + Facelets + Woodstock. But, woodstock is another story and also really looks like not a best solution.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Alexey Kakunin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-05T17:06:51Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Seam Portlet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1509664" />
    <author>
      <name>Raghu N N</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1509664</id>
    <updated>2008-10-29T21:16:41Z</updated>
    <published>2008-10-29T21:16:41Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I too frustratingly worked for Seam2+Liferay integration , it&amp;#39;s really painful. I&amp;#39;m also not comfortable with icefaces. My thoughts are moving   towards JBoss portals, bcoz JBoss seam bridge is available. I think Liferay will take some more time to support Seam , But Seam is awesome .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;raghu</summary>
    <dc:creator>Raghu N N</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-29T21:16:41Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Seam Portlet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1292920" />
    <author>
      <name>Vinicius Carvalho</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&amp;messageId=1292920</id>
    <updated>2008-09-10T20:13:45Z</updated>
    <published>2008-09-10T20:13:45Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hello there! We have a portal built using Seam + JBoss Portal and Portlet bridge. And damn it was painfull &lt;img alt="emoticon" src="@theme_images_path@/emoticons/sad.gif" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We really would enjoy replacing JBoss &amp;#34;Crappy&amp;#34; Portal for another solution. We are now evaluating liferay. But I have a few issues:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All my portlets are using Richfaces, and Liferay does not support it right?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I move to IceFaces (which I really would not like, because of the state saving  method, dunno if they support client now though) I&amp;#39;m still trying to figure how to use a bridge on Liferay. does it supports the bridges provided by Sun or it has its own, also, don&amp;#39;t know if seam is gonna work &lt;img alt="emoticon" src="@theme_images_path@/emoticons/tongue.gif" &gt; Has anyone tried it before?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards</summary>
    <dc:creator>Vinicius Carvalho</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-10T20:13:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
