ModeImpl cannot be resolved to a type

RE: ModeImpl cannot be resolved to a type

2020-02-07T16:52:11Z

Again, this was wrong.

Instead, in ModelLocalServiceImpl, you should have just called "createModel(0);" and let Liferay construct one properly.

Oh, and the way you did it in 6.2 was also wrong, it should have been createModel(0) there too.

RE: ModeImpl cannot be resolved to a type

2020-02-07T12:51:36Z

Thanks Olaf for your quick response.I did like this.InModeLocalServiceIml classgetInstance(){Model model=new ModelImpl()
return model;}

RE: ModeImpl cannot be resolved to a type

2020-02-07T10:28:01Z

Pankaj Kumar:

In 6.2 we are able to instance ModleImpl.e.g
Model model=new ModelImpl();but in Liferay 7.2 we cannot do it.Can any body tell me how we can do this in Liferay 7.2 version.

It's wrong to instantiate a ModelImpl directly in client code: Encapsulate it in a service and hand it out.
You want client code to purely be dependent on the interface, so that you can hand out any kind of wrapper at any time. Your client code is only dependent on the api, never on the service implementation.
It was always wrong (bad style) to access implementation classes. Luckily now it's also impossible without going through hoops. Don't go through hoops - have your service provide whatever it wants, under the Model interface.

ModeImpl cannot be resolved to a type

2020-02-07T09:59:56Z

Hi All,
In 6.2 we are able to instance ModleImpl.e.g
Model model=new ModelImpl();but in Liferay 7.2 we cannot do it.Can any body tell me how we can do this in Liferay 7.2 version.
Thanks,Pankaj Semwal