Support of AMP in future Liferay version https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=119785294&threadId=117980532 2026-04-04T23:12:33Z 2026-04-04T23:12:33Z Eric DARIEL https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&messageId=119536200 2025-10-21T05:12:37Z 2020-07-04T08:56:44Z

I reply to myself.It seems AMP is aligned with roadmap :<br />https://issues.liferay.com/plugins/servlet/mobile#issu/LPS-10963<br /><br />How can we know if it is for this year and 7.3 or for latter?<br /> It is possible to know the roadmap for 7. 3? <br /><br />Eric. 

Eric DARIEL 2020-07-04T08:56:44Z David H Nebinger https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&messageId=117985563 2019-12-04T22:01:07Z 2019-12-04T22:01:07Z

The problem, of course, is consensus. While AMP might be important to you, better React integration is important to someone else. With so many pulls in so many different directions, it&#39;s hard for any one direction to become a priority.<br /><br />And honestly, there&#39;s a lot of credible high-profile web developers who suggest avoiding AMP at all costs, such as this article suggests: <a href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/">https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/</a><br /><br />If you read that and other articles, there seems to be a lot of good sense behind avoiding AMP.

David H Nebinger 2019-12-04T22:01:07Z Eric DARIEL https://liferay.dev/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=119785294&messageId=117980531 2025-10-21T05:12:37Z 2019-12-04T20:59:16Z

It would be great if Liferay can support AMP. <br />I think we can make AMP pages with a new dedicated theme but it will great to have it included in OOTB. 

Eric DARIEL 2019-12-04T20:59:16Z