New continuous integration server

Brian,
Hudson is quickly becoming a better alternative to CruiseControl. I recommend that you switch to Hudson for the following reasons:

o JSR 286 Portlet available to fetch and display Project status from Hudson.
o It has a very vibrant community behind it.
o Much more usable and maintainable than CruiseControl.
o Multiple releases per month and is one of the most active project on java.net
o Large number of plugins available and in development.
o Glassfish, OpenESB, JBoss etc are using it.

I have experience using it. Let me know if I can be of help. Infact we are already running a hudson process for the Liferay project.

Please sign in to reply.

I've got to agree with Raju. I've tried just about every freely available CI tool and it was pretty clear that Hudson is the best. I recommend trying it you might even love it.

Please sign in to reply.

I was looking over CI tools and from the reviews I liked Hudson as well. Good support for inter-project dependencies and seems simpler to use compared to Cruise Control.

Please sign in to reply.

Million Gravatar

Please sign in to reply.

Ok, we should migrate to Hudson then. Shouldn't be that bad. Thanks for the input everyone. Raju (we'll need to ping you!).

Please sign in to reply.

Ok, http://hudson.liferay.com is now the new server. MUCH better than CruiseControl.

Please sign in to reply.

Brian,

The Hudson server doesn't seem to be accessible. Has the URL changed or is it no longer available to the public?

Please sign in to reply.

The URL for the Hudson server is not http://hudson-01.liferay.com

Please sign in to reply.

Hi,
I'm currently working on a Hudson / Liferay / Weblogic integration. Anyone have any pointers or docs on this setup?

Thanks,
John

Please sign in to reply.

Menu Display

Blogs

Category Filter

More Blog Entries

Inter Portlet Communication: One size does not fit all

Something fun.